You have a
In short, Yes. Unless you invoke your right remain silent, your silence may be used against you. In the United States, the state can use a suspect's silence against them in court if they do not affirmatively invoke their right to remain silent.
In most cases, admission by silence is not admissible in court. However, there are limited exceptions. First and foremost, evidence of a defendant's silence can only be introduced against a defendant who was not under arrest at the time the accusation was made.
In Australia, there is a fundamental common law right to silence, which means that you cannot be compelled to incriminate yourself. The prosecution carries the burden of proving the allegations against you 'beyond reasonable doubt'. If the prosecution fails, the accused will be acquitted of the charge(s).
Australia does not have Miranda rights but instead has similar rights that come from the Evidence Act 1995 and the Law Enforcement (Powers and Responsibilities) Act 2002 (NSW).
While Australian police officers are not obligated to recite the Miranda Rights, nor does Australia even have a comparable version of them, Australians do have a fundamental legal right to silence. This means that you do have the right to remain silent when questioned prior to or during legal proceedings.
In general, you have the right to silence. This means that you do not have to answer any questions the police ask you. It can be a good idea to use this right, because what you say to the police, no matter when or where, could be used against you.
The powerful true story of the first police officer to lift the lid on police corruption in Queensland and what then happened to him. 'Wherever there is power and money, there is always the risk of corruption. But everyone has a choice: to become involved or to take a stand against it.
The right to silence in Australia is recognised by state and federal courts as a fundamental common law right. You probably recognise the phrase “I plead the Fifth”. It is a go-to line for countless characters on American television who have just been arrested.
The right to silence is a legal principle which guarantees any individual the right to refuse to answer questions from law enforcement officers or court officials. It is a legal right recognized, explicitly or by convention, in many of the world's legal systems.
Power relations come into play, and social, cultural and economic considerations may affect a person's ability to express his or her disagreement. Therefore, the absence of verbal disagreement does not necessarily mean that someone agrees. Silence does not signify consent.
Your silence shows that you simply are confident in what you've got said which you respect the opposite person enough to listen to what they need to mention. The silence also allows the opposite party to return to their own conclusions which may lead to them digging themselves during a hole.
When silence is not misrepresentation. Except as already stated1, mere silence or inaction, however morally reprehensible it may be2, neither constitutes, nor is equivalent or contributory to, misrepresentation.
Silent treatment abuse is a form of emotional abuse in which a person refuses to communicate with you in order to control or influence your behaviors. Taking time to cool down after an argument is healthy, but shutting off communication for a long time, especially in order to control another person, is a form of abuse.
Silence speaks volumes
The best revenge is no reaction. Believe it, the silence and zero reaction really bothers your ex, and they consider it as the best served revenge. Nothing creates more curiosity than silence.
Most psychologists indicate that it depends on the situation. When silence, or, rather, the refusal to engage in a conversation, is used as a control tactic to exert power in a relationship, then it becomes "the silent treatment," which is toxic, unhealthy, and abusive.
The privilege against self-incrimination means that a person cannot be compelled to provide documents or answer questions if those documents or answers may incriminate the person.
The right to silence reflects the notion that in a criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof; it is not up to the accused to show their innocence. It also reflects the long-held idea that people should not be forced to answer questions regarding possible illegal behaviour.
Section 5 of the Constitution of Australia empowers the Governor-General of Australia to prorogue the Australian Parliament, thereby bringing the current legislative session to an end.
The common law right to silence has been codified in the New South Wales Evidence Act 1995. The act states that no adverse inference is to be drawn based on evidence that a person failed to answer the questions of authorities (Section 89).
A code of silence is a condition in effect when a person opts to withhold what is believed to be vital or important information voluntarily or involuntarily.
Is it legal to film police? (filming police) You have a legal right to film in public. Therefore, you can film or take photos of police when they are performing their duties if they are in public.
You can be pulled over if the police reasonably suspect that you are committing a criminal offence, if they are going to perform a roadside random breath test, or if you have breached a traffic offence. A police officer also has the power to give reasonable directions for the safe and efficient regulation of traffic.
Essentially, police vehicle searches are only lawful when the police have a valid search warrant, the driver's consent, or when there are reasonable grounds to suspect that there is evidence of criminal activity in the vehicle.