While older data suggested around 80% of American males were circumcised, more recent studies indicate a decline, with rates dropping below 50% for newborns in some analyses, though overall prevalence remains high (over 70% in some general figures) and varies significantly by region and ethnicity, with rates highest in the Midwest and Northeast, and declining overall since the 1960s peak.
Australia has seen a decrease in circumcision rates over the last 70 years or so. Back in the 1950s, roughly 80 per cent of Australian men and boys were circumcised. That rate has steadily decreased and now, around 20 per cent of Australian newborns are circumcised.
Circumcision is quite common. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recently reviewed current trends of newborn circumcision in the U.S., and the national rate was approximately 60 percent. According to the data, circumcision rates are highest in the Midwest and Northeast and lowest in the West.
Between 2008 and 2010, the prevalence of circumcision in the United States was estimated to be around 80%. Similarly, Wolters Kluwer estimated that close to 80% of United States males in 2021 were circumcised.
In Japan, routine male circumcision has never been implemented for newborns and children, and adult males are mostly circumcised at aesthetic clinics. However, media reports indicate a trend of Japanese mothers willing to have their sons circumcised.
European countries consider newborn circumcision an unnecessary surgical procedure which increases the costs of operating nationalised health systems, whereas in the US, circumcision is generally considered a simple, rapid operation with medical benefits which accrue throughout life.
There are no systematic reports of accurate prevalence of circumcision in Latin America, but isolated reports from selected groups from Latin American and the Caribbean ranging from 5% in Dominican Republic and Haiti to 11% (Panama, Costa Rica and Colombia), and 38% in Mexico.
For those circumcised (n = 91), the median regret score was 0 (IQR 0–25). For those uncircumcised (n = 28), median regret score was 0 (IQR 0–24). Overall, 55% of both groups reported no regret (DRS = 0), 24% had low-mild regret (DRS 5–25), and 21% yielded moderate-strong regret (DRS 30–100).
However, a new study by researchers at Johns Hopkins Medicine and the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health reveals that neonatal male circumcision (NMC) rates in the United States declined nearly 5% in the 10 years following the American Academy of Pediatrics statement in favor of the practice.
Among our patients, when asked about pain during circumcision performed under local anesthesia on a scale 1-10 with 1 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain of your life, more than 90% of patients rate pain as 2-3. Most patients do not take prescribed pain medications or any other pain medications.
Male circumcision is one of the most common procedures in the world. Approximately 40% of the worldwide male population is circumcised, and the prevalence is even higher among male children born in the United States [1,2].
We found that the vast majority of men expressed positive changes in sexual performance and ability to satisfy sexual partners after being circumcised and many men connected these feelings with increased feelings of masculinity.
We found 15.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.7 to 17.1) of British men aged 16–44 years reported being circumcised in Natsal 2000. Age specific prevalence was greatest among men aged 40–44 years (19.6%, 95% CI 16.8 to 22.7) compared to those aged 16–19 years (11.7%, 95% CI 9.0 to 15.2).
The ceremony imparts the customs, laws and cultural responsibilities of Aboriginal society. Traditionally, as part of the initiation, various physical rites take place, such as circumcision, tooth avulsion, plucking of bodily hair, scarification and the removal of fingernails.
Australian States operate public hospitals. By the end of 2007, most public hospitals had stopped providing free non-therapeutic circumcisions, however, Medicare still offered a subsidy.
More information about sexual health
The estimate indicates that circumcision is higher among countries where the Muslim or Jewish faith are commonplace, such as Iran (100 per cent), Iraq (99 per cent), West Bank (99 per cent), Yemen (99 per cent), Indonesia (93 per cent), Syria (93 per cent), and Israel (92 per cent).
Christianity and circumcision
In the Old Testament circumcision is clearly defined as a covenant between God and all Jewish males. Circumcision is not laid down as a requirement in the New Testament. Instead, Christians are urged to be "circumcised of the heart" by trusting in Jesus and his sacrifice on the cross.
In addition to HIV, male circumcision has been shown to reduce the risk of other heterosexually acquired sexually transmitted infections (STIs). Two trials demonstrated that male circumcision reduces the risk of acquiring genital herpes by 28% to 34%, and the risk of developing genital ulceration by 47%.
In the present physician survey, the most common reasons neonatal circumcision was not offered included the institution was not a birth hospital, the procedure was not covered by insurance, and low insurance reimbursement.
Eventually, the foreskin should be retracted far enough during urination to see the meatus (the hole where the urine comes from). This prevents urine from building up beneath the foreskin and possibly causing an infection. As long as the foreskin doesn't easily retract, only the outside needs to be cleaned.
Islam is the largest religious group to practice male circumcision. As an Abrahamic faith, Islamic people practice circumcision as a confirmation of their relationship with God, and the practice is also known as 'tahera', meaning purification.
Most men, >90-95%, reported no change in feeling before and after circumcision. About 5% of men reported a change in sensation, most minor, with half (2.5%) of them reporting increase and half (2.5%) reporting decrease in sensation. Overall, there is no significant change in sensation after circumcision for most men.
The CDC researchers estimated total circumcision prevalence to be 80.5% (Table 1). Racial differences were apparent: Prevalence was 90.8% in non-Hispanic white, 75.7% in non-Hispanic black, and 44.0% in Mexican American males.
It depends on the community. We are currently working with a Mennonite community and all the boys that have been born were circumcised. There is an Amish community downstate that doesn't circumcise. So it really depends on the community as to what they practice.
About 1 in 7 newborns in Australia undergo circumcision.