The Little Albert Experiment demonstrated that classical conditioning—the association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior—works in human beings. In this experiment, a previously unafraid baby was conditioned to become afraid of a rat.
The Little Albert experiment was a study that mid-20th century psychologists interpret as evidence of classical conditioning in humans. The study is also claimed to be an example of stimulus generalization although reading the research report shows that fear did not generalize by color or tactile qualities.
This experiment is considered very unethical. The researchers failed to decondition Albert to the stimuli he was afraid of, which should have been done after the experiment. Albert ended up passing away at the age of six due to hydrocephalus, a condition that can lead to brain damage.
This Albert was not brain-damaged and was easy-going, though (likely coincidentally, given how Albert's fears would diminish between sessions) he had an aversion to dogs! Albert died in 2007, without ever knowing of his early life in a hospital residence, or of his apparent part in psychology's history.
The Little Albert experiment presents an example of how classical conditioning can be used to condition an emotional response. Neutral Stimulus: A stimulus that does not initially elicit a response (the white rat).
Answer and Explanation: The Little Albert Experiment demonstrates a violation of the principle of beneficence and nonmaleficence in American Psychological Association Ethical Principles and Code of Conduct. This principle states that psychologists strive to benefit others in their work, and to do no harm.
To find out if Classical Conditioning works on humans. Specifically, to find out if a fear response can be conditioned into a 9 month old baby boy. Also, to see if the fear response will be generalised to other animals and objects and how long the conditioning lasts.
The Little Albert experiment demonstrated that classical conditioning (the association of a particular stimulus or behavior with an unrelated stimulus or behavior) works in human beings.
“Little Albert,” the baby behind John Watson's famous 1920 emotional conditioning experiment at Johns Hopkins University, has been identified as Douglas Merritte, the son of a wetnurse named Arvilla Merritte who lived and worked at a campus hospital at the time of the experiment — receiving $1 for her baby's ...
The Little Albert experiment is a demonstration of classical conditioning. John B. Watson's work, especially with Little Albert, contributed to psychology through the development of methodological behaviorism. Behaviorism and its concepts are the basis for many psychological approaches to treatment in the present day.
Answer and Explanation: While the Little Albert experiment did fail to meet various standards of the current ethical standards of scientific study, it did not involve any deception, as far as the study's report suggests. The most unethical part of the study is the fear conditioning procedure.
The experiment was not carefully designed or conducted, Little Albert's Fears were not Objectively Measured, but were Subjectively Observed. The experiment was unethical because Watson and Raynor, did not extinguish Little Albert's Fear Response to furry animals and objects.
Identify the major flaw with John B. Watson's Little Albert experiment. ANSWER : It is unethical for a researcher to induce fear in a child, since it is harmful to induce fear.
What would you predict about Little Albert based on principle of spontaneous recovery? Little Albert would eventually forget about his fear to the white rat, sealskin coat, rabbit, and the dog.
In this case, the loud noise was an unconditioned stimulus that could trigger the unconditioned reflexes of crying. The rat was initially a neutral stimulus that did not scare the child. But after conditioning, the rat became a conditioned stimulus that elicited a conditioned fear response in Little Albert.
A common example of behaviorism is positive reinforcement. A student gets a small treat if they get 100% on their spelling test. In the future, students work hard and study for their test in order to get the reward.
An example of behaviorism is when teachers reward their class or certain students with a party or special treat at the end of the week for good behavior throughout the week. The same concept is used with punishments. The teacher can take away certain privileges if the student misbehaves.
Behavioral experiments are planned experiential activities to test the validity of a belief. They are an information gathering exercise, the purpose of which is to test the accuracy of an individual's beliefs (about themselves, others, and the world) or to test new, more adaptive beliefs (Bennett-Levy et al., 2004).
What is the primary conclusion John B. Watson's made after working with Little Albert? Behavior is motivated by the consequences we receive for the behavior: reinforcements and punishments. Emotions can be a conditioned response.
Conclusion. Bobo doll experiment demonstrated that children are able to learn social behavior such as aggression through the process of observation learning, through watching the behavior of another person. The findings support Bandura's (1977) Social Learning Theory.
According to what Watson said in his notes, the boy was the son of an orphanage's nurse. He was chosen for the experiment due to his calm and somewhat indifferent character and response to external stimuli.
Watson and Rayner concluded from the trials when Little Albert was 11 months and 10 days that a fear response could be conditioned and a fear response could be transferred to different stimuli and different situations. Thus fear can be learnt in humans through the process of classical conditioning.
Little Albert was withdrawn from the hospital. Watson and Rayner could not remove the fear response so it is unknown as to whether the fear remained in Albert. Is the Little Albert Study generalisable? As he was only a child and only one participant was tested for the fear response, it is not representative.
John Watson and Rosalie Rayner sought to test the limits of fear conditioning by recruiting a small child to partake in their study. The nine month old infant, known simply as "Little Albert B," was selected for his developmental and emotional stability at such a young age [1].